Contact
hnomad[at]meshs[POINT]frIn November 2017, the Maison européenne des sciences de l'homme et de la société (MESHS) organizes the fourth edition of DHnord, its annual Digital Humanities conference. This year's edition is co-organized by the MESHS and the Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (C2DH). The theme is "(De)constructing digital history". The call for papers is open until May 31. The conference programme is to be released on July 1st. The conference will take place in November 27-29 in Lille, France (instructions for international travellers here).
Keynote speakers
Bertrand Jouve (CNRS Senior Researcher in Mathematics) (forthcoming title)
Manfred Thaller (emeritus professor, University of Cologne) | "Distrustful Brothers 2.0 - On the relationship of quantitative history and 'digital' history"
Introduction Conference
Andreas Fickers (Professor, University of Luxembourg/Director C2DH) | "Digital History: On the heuristic potential of thinkering"
Scientific committee
Martine Benoit (Professor, University of Lille/Director MESHS)
Frédéric Clavert (Maitre Assistant, University of Lausanne)
Marten Düring (Researcher, DEIS, University of Luxembourg)
Andreas Fickers (Professor, University of Luxembourg/Director C2DH)
Stéphane Lamassé (Lecturer, University Paris 1)
Serge Noiret (History Information Specialist, European University Institute)
Sofia Papastamkou (Research Engineer, History PhD, MESHS/CNRS)
Emilien Ruiz (Lecturer, University of Lille)
(De)constructing Digital History: scientific argument
What is digital history? The term has been coined since at least 1999 (Ayers, 1999) and was further generalized by 2005 (Lines Andersen 2002, Lee 2002, Cohen & Rosenzweig 2005). Broadly defined, digital history is "an approach to examining and representing the past that works with the new communication technologies of the computer, the internet network, and software systems" (Seefeldt, Thomas 2009). In other words, it describes historical inquiry that is based on primary sources available as electronic data, whether digitized or born-digital, and the narratives that are constructed through such inquiries (Lee 2002).
The rise of digital history is in general perceived as the phase defined by the democratization of the personal computer technology, network applications and the development of open-source software (Thomas 2004, Cohen & Rosenzweig 2005, Graham, Milligan & Weingart 2015). With slight differences in periodization, medium-centered (e.g. relying on the use of the computer) genealogies see digital history at least partly as a descendant of quantitative and computational history, tracing its beginnings through the end of the 40s to the 60s (Thomas 2004, Graham, Milligan & Weingart 2015). Broader approaches insist instead on the heritage of public and oral history (Noiret 2011, Scheinfeldt 2014). Digital history participated greatly to the rise and development of the field of digital humanities since the mid-2000s (Schreibman et al. 2004, Kirschenbaum 2010, Gold 2012). However, specific disciplinary objects, sources and approaches continue to be present within the connected use of methods and tools that takes place under the digital humanities big tent. A typology of digital history projects identifies three main fields: academic research, public history, and pedagogy projects, of which the last two categories are considered particularly specific to historians within the digital humanities field (Robertson 2016).
We therefore propose to address digital history through this triple spectrum: academic research, public history, and pedagogy, in order to trace continuities and transformations in history as a discipline; and contribute to explore the broader digital humanities field through this case study.
1/ Academic research
It is understood that scholarly research in history has been affected by the digitization of sources, methods and the environment in which research is conducted, produced and disseminated (Clavert & Noiret 2013). Nonetheless, there also seems to be a tension between the potentiality of digital history and the actual delivery of argument-driven scholarship (Blevins 2016). In the last two decades, a significant number of digital history projects have been elaborated and, furthermore, digital history has been institutionalized through the creation of specialized departments in several universities. We should then be able to identify the impact of mutations in the ways historical research is driven and communicated, on the one hand; the novelties in objects, methods and analysis tools, and the eventual issues they raise, on the other.
In this sense, what is called the data revolution (Kitchin 2014) is one important component to take into account and to explore further. The massive production of digitized/born-digital historical data challenges historians’ existent approaches and methods of research and analysis, as recent debates on the longue durée approach have shown (Guldi & Armitage 2014, Annales 70 2/2015) or the transnational turn (Putnam 2016), just to mention a few. Moreover, it raises issues on how historians relate with present time and what their role is in digital preservation matters as showcase social media and other web-based ephemeral data (Webster 2015, Rosenzweig 2003). What is essentially at stake is inter-/transdisciplinary cooperation, even the dependency of history on input from other disciplines, whether from human, social or computer science (computational linguistics, visual analytics...), engineering, library and information science. Indeed, the use of connected methodologies as historians adopt new epistemologies (data mining and visualization, GIS, encoded critical edition), sheds light on the need to adapt historians’ literacy through the development of a shared culture with computer science and mathematics (Genet 1986, Lamassé & Rygiel 2014).
Furthermore, the ecology of scientific data raises some important interdisciplinary issues related to their collection, storage, archiving, dissemination and the correspondent infrastructures. What kind of scientific sovereignty can be exercised once data storage and infrastructures are externalized, and what is its impact on access and sustainability of scientific research and its output? How can disciplinary needs for effective organization and description of historical information be met (e.g. specific ontologies) in a global environment of structured interoperable data? Moreover, old problems of biases concerning the access of primary sources are updated as the result of digitization and its possible impact on availability or, instead, underrepresentation of certain types of archives (Putnam 2016, Milligan 2013). Let's consider, for example, the impact of institutional decision-making and constraints (such as financial ones) on the digitization of sources, new actors in the web ecosystem such as digitization companies, or even digital fractures and inequalities at national and transnational levels, just to evoke some of the most probable biases. Last but not least, one should not forget the biases that algorithms and software can generate during the collection and analysis of historical data.
2/ Digital history and public history
From an exhaustive literature on the synergies between digital and public history (Noiret 2011, Cauvin 2016), we chose to focus on topics that shed light on the blurred frontiers between public and scholarly history, especially the osmosis between scholars, cultural heritage institutions, private sector and citizens. From this point of view, we propose to explore three main thematic unites. First, ways in which technology is used in the cultural heritage sector in order to engage the public with history: uses of social media, augmented and virtual reality, development of tools for the public to explore patrimonial data and collections, game industry and history, private sector digitization and engagement with history... Second, historical memory and the way it emerges at individual, collective and institutional levels to show using facts the relation of people to history and the multiple ways the present affects the perception of the past. Finally, the documentation of present-time events that actually builds primary sources and archives for future historians: crowdsourced archives, social and political movements documentation (such as Spanish 15M, Nuit débout, Women's March), political uses of technology (social media propaganda, institutional use of social media, political use of game industry as in the case of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict etc). How is authority conceived and how does the role of historian persist in such diversified multi-actor contexts?
3/ Pedagogy
During the last few years, several digital history departments have been created in various universities in different countries. Furthermore, even in traditional history departments, teaching now integrates components of digital culture or associated skills. There are specialized tutorial blogs (The Programming Historian, La boîte à outils des historiens) providing for skill transfers between historians; digital transdisciplinary schools (such as the Digital Methods Initiative of the University of Amsterdam); an array of online services or/and software for one to easily explore and analyze data (Düring et al. 2011, Nodegoat, AnalyseSHS...). However, few systematic approaches allow to have an overall view of how historians get on with the digital transformations of their profession (Heimburger & Ruiz 2011) and even less from a transnational perspective. How are historians to teach digital history in these contexts and how are traditional and DH teaching articulated? What skills and methods do teachers need to develop for themselves, in order to teach them, and for their students to acquire them? How to better fit teaching to specific research interests so that students are able to acquire a method than simply become able to manage tools (Mahoney, Pierazzo 2012)? How are modules organized and how do students react to the teaching of digital history? How can a minimum skillset be defined in order to assure research of an acceptable quality and corresponding level publications but also a balance between a historian's basic training and the acquisition of this skillset? Although there have been works developing the discussion (and solutions) regarding mainly the web resources (Cohen, Rosenzweig 2006), there is less focus on the ways interdisciplinarity is embedded in digital history teaching and even less on how to deal with born-digital data (e.g. social media data) use and analysis as primary sources for historians in specific modules.
Possible areas of interest for proposals include, but are not limited to, the following:
Academic research
Natural language processing and text analytics applied to historical documents
Applications of GIS
Social Network Analysis
Image analysis
Analysis of longitudinal document collections
Entity relationship extraction, detecting and resolving historical references in text
Digitizing and archiving
Applications of Artificial Intelligence techniques to History
Handling uncertain and fragmentary text and image data
OCR and transcription
Epistemologies in the Humanities and Computer Science
Novel techniques for storytelling
Historical ontologies
Historical data management and infrastructures
Software and applications development
Public history
Museums and exhibiting the past
Oral history and community projects
Digital media, the Internet and participatory knowledge
Moving images and documentaries
Re-enactments and living history
Historic preservation and community cultural heritage
Public archaeology
Social media, mobile app and user-generated contents
Public policies and applied history
Historical memory construction and the Web
Teaching public history
Pedagogy
Introduction of digital research methods in classrooms
Designing digital history curricula
Digital teaching materials
Digital media as alternative to text-based student theses and research papers
Methods for digital student assessment
Teaching digital literacy
Teaching the history of the “Digital Age”
Digital history teaching commons
Proposals (up to 1000 words) can be submitted until May 31 June 20, 2017 in English or in French. All proposals will be considered. For further questions please contact dhnord[at]meshs[dot]fr
References
Annales, 70 (2), 2015 (special issue: "La longue durée en débat")
Edward L. Ayers, "The pasts and Futures of Digital History", University of Virginia, 1999
Cameron Blevins, "Digital History’s Perpetual Future Tense" in Lauren F. Klein & Matthew K. Gold (ed.), Digital Humanities: The Expanded Field, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2016
Thomas Cauvin, Public History: a Textbook of Practice, Routledge, New York, 2016
Frédéric Clavert, Serge Noiret (ed.), L’histoire contemporaine à l’ère numérique - Contemporary History in the Digital Age, Brussels, Peter Lang, 2013
Daniel J.Cohen, Roy Rosenzweig, Digital history: a guide to gathering, preserving, and presenting the past on the Web, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006
Marten Düring, Matthias Bixler, Michael Kronenwett, Martin Stark, "VennMaker for Historians: Sources, Social Networks and Software", Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 21 (8), 2011
Jean-Philippe Genet, "Histoire, Informatique, Mesure", Histoire & Mesure, 1986, 1 (1), 7-18
Matthew K. Gold (ed.), Debates in the Digital Humanities, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2012
Shawn Graham, Ian Milligan, Scott Weingart, Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian’s Macroscope, London, Imperial College Press, 2015
Jo Guldi, David Armitage, The History Manifesto, Cambridge University Press, 2014
Franziska Heimburger, Émilien Ruiz, « Faire de l'histoire à l'ère numérique : retours d'expériences », Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 58-4bis, 5/2011, 70-89
Brett Hirsch (ed.), Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics, Open Book Publishers, 2012
Matthew G. Kirschenbaum, "What is Digital Humanities and What's It Doing in English Departments?", ADE Bulletin, 150, 2010, 55-61
Stéphane Lamassé & Philippe Rygiel, « Nouvelles frontières de l’historien », Revue Sciences/Lettres, 2, 2014
John K. Lee, "Principles for Interpretative Digital History Web Design", Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 5 (3), 2002
Deborah Lines Andersen, "Defining Digital History", Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 5 (1), 2002
Simon Mahony, Elena Pierazzo, "Teaching Skills or Teaching Methodology?" in Brett Hirsch (ed.), Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics, Open Book Publishers, 2012
Ian Milligan , « Illusionary Order: Online Databases, Optical Character Recognition, and Canadian History, 1997-2010 », Canadian Historical Review, 94 (4), December 2013, 540 569, DOI: 10.3138/chr.694
Serge Noiret, "La Digital History: histoire et mémoire à la portée de tous" in Pierre Mounier (ed.), Read Write Book 2 : Une introduction aux humanités numériques, Marseille, OpenEdition Press, 2012
Lara Putnam, "The Transnational and the Text-Searchable: Digitized Sources and the Shadows They Cast", American Historical Review, 121 (2), April 2016, 377-402, DOI: 10.1093/ahr/121.2.377
Stephen Robertson, "The Differences between Digital Humanities and Digital History" in Lauren F. Klein, Matthew K. Gold (ed.), Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2016
Roy Rosenzweig, "Scarcity or Abundance? Preserving the Past in a Digital Era", American Historical Review, 108, 3, 2003, 735-762
Tom Scheinfeldt, "The Dividends of Difference: Recognizing Digital Humanities' Diverse Family Tree/s", Found History, April 7, 2014
Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, John Unsworth (ed.), A Companion to Digital Humanities, Oxford, Blackwell, 2004
Douglas Seefeldt, William G. Thomas, "What Is Digital History?", Perspectives on History, 2009
William G. Thomas, "Computing and the Historical Imagination" in Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, John Unsworth (ed.), A Companion to Digital Humanities, Oxford, Blackwell, 2004
Peter Webster, "Will Historians of the Future Be Able to Study Twitter ?", Webstory, Peter Webster’s Blog, 6 March 2015
The conference will take place in the Maison européenne des sciences de l'homme et de la société, 2, rue des Canonniers, 59000 Lille, France.
How to get to Lille from abroad:
- International air travel: Lesquin airport (+20 min by bus to the centre of the city); Paris Charles de Gaulle airport (+ one hour TGV train or three hours by bus to Lille); Brussels South Charleroi airport (+ one hour and a half by bus); Brussels National (Zaventem) airport (+35 min Thalys train or one hour and a half by bus).
- International rail travel: Eurostar, Thalys, TGV.
- International bus network: Eurolines, Flibco, FlixBus...
